![]() |
|

©2001 chadsux
|
In This Edition Joe Ronzburg says, "Shrub Declares War On Public Information " Greg Palast explains Smirky's latest bad idea, "To Russia With Love And $15 Billion." Mary McGrory says Smirky is, "Leaving Conservationists Cold." Joe Conason fills us in, "On The Latest Rigged Missile Defense Test." Maureen Dowd takes us to, "Apetown My Hometown." Ceci Connolly says, "GOP Reactionaries In Charge Of Reproductive Health Policies" William Rivers Pitt reminds us to, "Remember Negroponte." Joan S. Livingston in the spirit of Allen Ginsberg gives us, "Howl 2000." Cokie Roberts wins the "Vidkun Quisling Award." Molly Ivins sheds some light on republican spin in, "Someone Might Notice." Tally Briggs is wondering who and when in, "The Profit's Curse" And finally in "Parting Shots" The Onion takes us along as, "Congress Holds Weekend Trust Building Retreat" but first Uncle Ernie gets down and gets funky singin', "Got Dem Ole Tax Cuttin' Blues Again!" We spotlight the cartoons of Dan Wasserman with additional cartoons from Mopaul, Media One, Rayberry, Kevin Siers, Chris Whitehouse, GWBush Art, Political Strikes and Chadsux.
Plus we have all of your favorite departments! Welcome one and all to "Uncle Ernie's Issues & Alibis." We hope you enjoy your stay! |

|
Said you wake up in de mornin'
I should have really known better. I hope I didn't waste all that teenage angst on LBJ. Certainly nothing has changed, except for 'hope' springing eternal in my fight to bring the Republic back. I thought I had that under control after all these years, oops. I should be far too wise to fall for all these patriotic calling traps. Far too old to go off tilting at windmills. To leave a safe middle class existence to run a rebel magazine and end up spending time in the wrong end of the 'Cheese Stamp Line." Who would have guessed? Who indeed, not I. What madness impels me to seek and publish the truth if I'm only screaming against the wind? Damned if I know but here I am just the same! So today boys and girls let's discuss how and why we all just got screwed. Otay? The reason that Smirky and his corporate pals are getting away with this is, what? Yes Jimi? That's right, it's the old "Bait and Switch." Americans are 'hypmotized' by shinny objects. Take this Smash and Grab' by our pals in Foggy Bottom. Let's take thousands of billions of dollars out of the treasury and then give most of it to the richest one per cent. Then we'll give nothing to the poor, who could really have used some tax relief and a three hundred dollar advancement on next April's taxes to some in the middle class. Are you wondering why the economy is going to hell boys and girls? That's right Mary, all this money got sucked out of the economy.
Wasn't this the money that President Clinton had for paying off more of President Doody's Aircraft Carriers Battle Groups fiasco? That's correct Sally Ann you win a cookie! You all remember the 80's where the rich got richer and everyone else got screwed, `member?
Of course any economist would tell you that had the money been spent on reducing our national debt our money would have been worth a lot more than three hundred a year for everybody. Instead of what's going to happened next.
And who do you think is still going to have to pay back this money? Hmmm. The Rich people who got most of the benefits? How much will they pay back? That's right Gary, not a dime, not a farthing, zilch, zip, zero ducats. What a very bright class you are today.
Well then what's going to happen to the poor? No let's not see all the same hands everytime. That's absolutely right Jamal their taxes will rise out of all proportion to reality but that's just a financial drop in the bucket? So whom do you think that leaves to pick up 90% of the tab? Can you say,boys and girls? I knew that you could! Do you think that day's pay you got in the mail is going to outweigh the damages done to yourself, your family and this nation? Are you beginning to understand why we've been rather anxious about everything since the Coup De' Etat went down? Can you say, "Tip Of The Ice Berg," boys and girls? In this country it's beginning to feel like our cast of characters have gathered, the scene is set and we're only waiting for President Von Hindenburg to die so that the play can begin. Class is dismissed ... |

|
Shrub Declares War On Public Information Joe Ronzburg Last week, as Megawati Sukarnoputri was installed as the new leader of Indonesia, the Bush administration attempted to recall a State Department book detailing the United States' role in the deaths of thousands of Indonesians in the 1960s in order to topple Sukarno -- Megawati's father. The basic record indicates we provided names of Communist supporters to the Indonesian Army, which in turn killed "at least 105,000 in 1965-66," according to the National Security Archive. But the details of what occurred can better be taken up at another time (click here for the NSA's article as well as the complete report). What's important here is that while the Shrub shreds international treaties which have been in the works for over 30 years, he is also isolating the U.S. government from his own people.
This action comes on the heels of Bush's holding up the release of the Reagan papers, which is mandated by federal
law. So just as he flouts international convention, Dubya also holds in contempt our own rules for how the
government is supposed to work. Of course, the White House is just making sure "that the Presidential Records Act
is implemented correctly," a spokeswoman told the Associated Press in June. Apparently, "implemented correctly"
means "subverted and rendered meaningless" in Bush-era doublespeak.
A Shot to the Suharto His aides told Kissinger that the weapons could only "be used for the defense of Indonesia," and later Kissinger as much as admits this when he castigates his staff for allowing discussions to be leaked to the press. "On the Timor thing, that will leak in three months, and it will come out that Kissinger overruled his pristine bureaucrats and violated the law," Kissinger said. So while he spun his actions as anti-communist, Kissinger knew full well the rule of law. Ironically, when Indonesia gave Abdurrahman Wahid the boot and installed Megawati last week, the Shrub had strong words for the new ruler: "[Bush] warned that she must find a 'peaceful resolution' to the separatist movements in Aceh and elsewhere," according to the New York Times. One might ask the United States -- given its complicity in the deaths of over 300,000 people -- what the definition of "peaceful" is. The War Against Public Information As I suggested before, though, the United States is just as interested in suppressing its own people as those in other countries. Late last week, Dr. Theodore Postol of MIT alleged that the Pentagon is threatening to defund a university laboratory because of his anti-missile defense views. The Pentagon wants Postol to stop distributing and to surrender copies of a report debunking crucial tests of missile defense. "The case has raised questions about whether a document can be considered secret if it is widely available to the public," the Times said. How widely available is it? Click here to obtain the documents the Pentagon doesn't want you to see. While MIT is concerned that it will lose over $300 million, at least the university's president noted that the U.S. is basically engaging in a war on the public's right to know: "The legitimate tools of classification of secrets should not be misused to limit responsible debate," the Times quoted Charles M. Vest. Perhaps instead of being upset that some classified information might be included in the report, the Pentagon is trying to cover up one of many things: a) that missile defense won't work; b) that key results were simply erased from the reports in order to hide failures; c) that tests were dumbed down to unrealistic levels of simplicity in order to ensure success. Was the Pentagon Rolling Snake Eyes? The crux of the false testing involves the kill vehicle's judging between a decoy and a real missile. In a letter to Clinton Chief of Staff John Podesta last year, Postol said the Ballistic Missile Defense Organization data showed "the defense system always wrongly identif[ied] a partially inflated balloon as the mock warhead. The team performing the post-flight analysis dealt with this failure by simply removing the balloon from the data, as if it was never there." This is a serious accusation of fraud. Since what is at stake is not the advancement of science but the future of the human race, if true this borders on a crime against humanity. But there's more. Postol suggests the scientists could not make the kill vehicle tell the difference between the warhead and a mock warhead, so they fudged the test to make sure the kill vehicle decided between warhead and decoy at a time when they knew the warhead would be brighter. They also reduced the number of decoys from nine to three -- but "because of the high probability that the seeker would mistake one of them for the mock warhead," the number of decoys was whittled down to one. "The procedures followed by the BMDO were like rolling a pair of dice and throwing away all outcomes that did not give snake eyes," Postol writes Podesta, "and then fraudulently making a claim that they have scientific evidence to show that they could reliably predict when a roll of the dice will be a snake eyes." Postol ends his impassioned plea by asking for a team of independent scientists to review the tests. Un-'Coyle'-ing the Missile Defense Lie We actually now have an independent review of the missile defense tests, called the Coyle Report, and it makes plain the many flaws in testing -- as well as the fact that the Pentagon tried to suppress the document for almost a year. In fact, the first few pages of the document are more about how the Pentagon tried to stonewall and keep the report secret even though "there has never been any claim that the Coyle report is classified." (You can read the entire report here, but it's a pdf file, so take precautions.) Here is an outline of the Coyle Report's finding of flaws:
* Program is too immature for us to even be thinking about a deployment date. * Test program hasn't tried to simulate multiple launches. * Pentagon provides kill vehicle with information ahead of time -- but of course the system will not know ahead of time much of this information. * Accidental launching of multiple kill vehicles due to radar inefficiency. This is the system we are going to shred international treaties over. If We Can't Destroy Treaties, We Can Kill Foreign Relations I wish I could believe that lousy science would derail the push to pursue missile defense. But oddly enough, we seem much more interested in destroying treaties than in actually getting things done. When we disagreed with the Kyoto Protocol, instead of fighting for a different version we simply dropped out. When we disagreed with how to enforce the biological weapons treaty, instead of fighting for a different version we simply dropped out. And since we disagree with the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, instead of fighting for a different version we will simply drop out. This is a sea change from 20 years ago. When the Gipper dreamed of lasers in space, his staff well knew that they might be butting up against the terms of the ABM Treaty. While there were some who favored withdrawing from the treaty, the administration tried to stretch the language of the treaty to support whatever tests they wanted to perform. In other words, as hawkish as they were, Reagan's people wanted to honor the letter of the agreement -- though they sought to redefine the letters -- instead of jettisoning it. Treaty Me Right, George Adam Joyce has argued many times in this space (check out some samples here, here, here and here) -- and it is certainly not his original argument -- that missile defense can lead to an escalation of the arms race. This is because other countries will assume that they have no deterrent for our offensive threat and that we will not hesitate to launch a first strike. A buildup of offensive weapons to overwhelm our defensive "capability" is all they will have left.
This presents many problems for us, especially if our "defense" doesn't work. But even if it works perfectly, that is
no reason not to work with other countries to decide how we will keep the world safe. Science has its place, defense
has its place and diplomacy has its place. The Shrubbies believe only in the second of these three, and the time
they spend alienating foreign countries is precious time we could be using to advance the cause of peace in this
world. |

|
Here's a hot idea: Why don't we send 10,000 tons of high level uranium waste to
Russia? You'd rather not? Not until you buy your lead suit?
OK then, how about we send 10,000 tons of radioactive garbage to Russia AND
throw in $15 billion for Vladimir Putin. For the cash, Putin must solemnly promise
to store the potential bomb-making material safely and not let any of it slip into the
hands of the Iranians or the IRA.
Just when I thought the Bush Administration had adopted every crack-brained
idea that could threaten Mother Earth, along comes another. This
send-uranium-to-Russia scheme is the creation of something called the
Non-Proliferation Trust (NPT Inc), a Washington group which ‘grew out of
extensive dialog with ... the arms control community and the environmental
community.'
If by ‘arms control community' you were thinking Greenpeace, you'd be a bit wide
of the mark. The Chairman of NPT Inc is Admiral Daniel Murphy, once Deputy
Director of the CIA and Bush Senior's chief of staff. The other seven listed board
members and executives include the former CIA chief William Webster, two
nuclear industry executives, one former Nixon administration insider, the general
who commanded the US Marine Corp, one top Masonic official and, indeed, one
certified greenie tree-hugger.
It may not be your typical save-the-world line up, but their idea is worth a hearing.
Russia has a huge hot pile of ‘fissile material' - bomb fixings and old nuclear
plant rods - sitting in polluted Siberian towns whose very names, like Chilyabinsk
14, sound radioactive. NPT Inc's idea is that if we send them more radioactive
garbage, plus cash, Russia will then have the means and obligation to store
theirs, and ours, safely.
This month, the scheme got a big boost when the Duma, pressured by Putin,
abolished the Russian law which barred the nation's importing most foreign
nuclear waste.
NPT Inc's assemblage of ex-spooks and militarists (and their lone green
compatriot) control the operation through three non-profit trusts. But non-profit
does not mean that no one gains.
This self-described charity will pay a British American deal-maker, Alex Copson,
some unidentified percentage of the deal. NPT has been reluctant to give details
of Copson's potential gain from the success of NPT - it took several calls and
pointed questions - possibly because the polo-and-sports-car afficionado with the
posh accent lacks the diplomatic gloss appropriate to this sensitive enterprise.
Copson notoriously described the natives of the Marshall Islands as ‘fat, lazy,
fucks' when they nixed one of his nuke dump schemes. Copson, I'm assured, is
kept well away from NPT's Russian operations.
Contractors will share a few billion, including German power consortium,
Gellschaft fir Nuklear-Behaltg mbH (GNB). Dr. Klaus Janberg of GNB is director of
NPT International.
But the real winner, should NPT succeed, would be the moribund nuclear
industry, which George Bush hopes to bring back from the crypt. But there is
one huge obstacle: waste. If you think about it, the only indispensable appliance
for a kitchen is a toilet; so too, one cannot build a nuclear plant
without planning for the end product.
At $15 billion, dumping in Russia is a bargain. Since Russia is already a nuclear
toilet, who would notice a little more hot crud?
Russia's own environmentalists have noticed, but objections from their Ecological
Union are smothered by the ringing endorsement of the nuclear
issues chief of one of America's richest environmental groups, the Natural
Resources Defense Council. NRDC's Dr Thomas Cochrane sits on NPT Inc's
MinAtom Trust board of directors painting the project with a heavy coat of green.
What on Mother Earth would drive the NRDC man to front for NPT? Bernardo Issel,
director of the Washington-based Non-Profit Accountability Project
sent The Observer a copy of NPT Inc's draft, ‘Long-term Fissile Materials
Safeguards and Security Project.' At page 18, one finds arrangements for the
NRDC to administer a $200 million Russian ‘environmental reclamation fund' for
which the green group will receive a fee of up to 10% of expenditures, a cool $20
million.
NRDC's Cochrane insists his group would have never taken that role. An NPT
spokesman says the clause has been removed from a new draft contract, though
they have refused our request to see that document.
It would be wrong to assume that this is another case of greens selling out for
greenbacks. The NRDC's Dr Cochrane is as straight a shooter as you'll ever
meet. The problem here is not payola, but philosophy. The NRDC represents the
new wave of environmental organization enchanted with the use of market
mechanisms. The group is mesmerized by can-do entrepreneurs with access to
huge mounds of capital, and sold on the pleasant if naive idea that the profit
motive can be bent to the public good.
The NRDC and other pro-market environmentalists are always on the hunt for
what their prophet, Amory Lovins, calls ‘win-win' cases - deals which aid the
environment while making the big bucks for the corporate players. To the horror of
many consumer advocates, NRDC stood with business lobbyists to push the
trade in ‘pollution credits' and promote de-regulation of electricity in California,
though the group did a quick flip on deregulation when the scheme flopped.
The NPT scheme is the quintessential public-private partnership that business
greens find irresistible. For Dr Cochrane, the uranium dumping scheme's
attraction is NPT Inc's promise, which cannot be easily dismissed, to provide
billions to clean up Russia's radioactive hell-holes. And NPT also promises to
toss in $250 million to a Russian Orphans Fund.
Environmental clean-up, non-proliferation and orphans. Why would Russia's
green activists turn away from this obvious win-win? The answer, in a word, is
"MinAtom."
MinAtom, Russia's ministry of atomic industries is, of course, the agency which
created the nuclear mess in the first place. Can Minatom be trusted to
safely handle both the nuclear fuel and faithfully use the several billion for
environmental clean-up, not to mention the orphans?
USEC - What's a bit of bias, self-interesting and self dealing among friends?
As soon as I heard, ‘MinAtom,' I ran to my notes of the Observer's interview earlier
this year with Dr Joseph Stiglitz, one-time chief of Bill Clinton's
Council of Economic Advisors. During a tea break, the economist told me about
an incident involving MinAtom which disturbs him to this day.
In July 1998, the Clinton Administration privatized the United States Enrichment
Corporation, USEC. The privatized USEC proved inefficient at enriching uranium,
but exceptionally efficient in enriching several Clinton associates. Hillary's
sidekick Susan Thomases was a USEC lobbyist. The law
firm that defended the President in one of Bill's bimbo law suits picked up $15
million for work leading up to USEC's flotation. A federal judge
concluded that documents USEC tried to conceal suggest the privatization
decision was influenced by, "bias, self-interest and self-dealing."
To sell privatization, Clinton's buddies at USEC promised their corporation would
buy up tons of Russia's old warhead uranium.from MinAtom. As with NPT, the
sales pitch was that private industry by taking over government enrichment
operations, could reduce the amount of bomb ingredients in Russia's hands at no
cost to the US treasury. Another public-private win-win.
But Stiglitz, ever the hard-nosed economist, he could not fathom how this new
profit-making corporation pay the Russians above market price for the uranium.
The answer was, USEC couldn't. In 1996, some birdie dropped a damning
document on Stiglitz' desk. It was a memo indicating that MinAtom had
demanded USEC take about double the amount of uranium originally expected.
Rather than take the costly deliveries, USEC quietly arranged a payment to
MinAtom of $50 million. Stiglitz called it, "hush money." USEC says it was a
legitimate pre-payment for the hot stuff. However one describes it, MinAtom was
more than happy to play along, for a price.
Yet NPT Inc tells us that MinAtom and US private enterprise can now form a
trustworthy partnership to safeguard nuclear material for the next few
thousand years. At first, this puzzled me: NPT Inc's board is led by the CIA and
military men who pushed Star Wars which they sold on the premise that Russia
has probably let slip nuclear material to unnamed ‘rogue states.'
But I think I've solved this puzzling conundrum. What we have here is the ultimate,
and very green, recylcing program: NPT ships America's uranium
to the Russians, who lose track of a bit here and there ... which falls into the
hands of a Rogue State ... which then returns it to the USA perched atop an
intercontinental ballistic missile ... which is shot down by the trillion-dollar Star
Wars defense system. Win-win for everyone. |
Leaving Conservationists Cold By Mary McGrory Of all the sad things about the furious fight over drilling in the Arctic, the saddest, perhaps, is that it didn't need to happen. Adoption of the simplest, pain-free strategies that have been test-marketed in California, where there really was an energy crisis, would have eliminated the need for disturbing the peace of the caribou that live in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, as well as that of Americans who do not agree with George W. Bush and his oil bidness friends that the planet is for pillaging. It is wrong to see the contest as a showdown over whether the caribou or the president stand more in need of protection -- Bush is notoriously prone to green accidents. He learned the hard way that environmentalists emphatically reject Vice President Cheney's dissing of conservation as a "private virtue," just not on the radar of the real men who run our country as a private preserve. Bush's polls went through the floor on this issue and scared him straight, although only in rhetoric. California, a state deplored by Bush not just for its adamant adherence to the Democrats, but for its obsessive environmentalism, was faced with a summer of rolling blackouts and worse. But California pulled itself together and instituted fuel economies, which resulted in an 11 percent reduction in consumption. Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) proudly reports that the most trifling changes, with no damage to the state's prized lifestyle, paid off big dividends. Putting off the use of appliances during peak hours (4 to 6 p.m.) was the beginning. Setting the thermostat on the air conditioners to 78, as Gov. Gray Davis (D) fervently urges, has helped. Anna Aurelio, of the U.S. Public Interest Research Group, says there are other equally modest moves that would yield energy savings equivalent to millions of barrels of oil: among them, inflating automobile tires to capacity to improve engine performance. The Bush administration prefers to go the fossil fuel route, which is much preferred by the CEOs, and to the revival of nuclear energy, even though it hasn't yet figured out what to do with the toxic waste. What Bush and his helpers in the White House overlooked, plainly, is that the people of California, far from feeling imposed upon, were glad to pitch in and help. Americans like to solve problems; it is in their blood. The idea of being able to do something about something is deeply gratifying. Ill health and heartbreak often can't be remedied, but turning down the cold and washing the dishes later strike people as small prices to pay for the common good. But George W. Bush lives in a bubble. He wants to be right with the right wing of his party; his audience is the Fortune 500 CEOs, who gave big bucks to his campaigns and expect to be rewarded with the tax breaks and subsidies found in Bush's energy program. Like his other enterprises, notably foreign policy, Bush's energy approach is highly personal, arbitrary and short-sighted. In foreign policy, he seems to go by aversions and crushes. Leading the aversions are our European allies, who unaccountably fail to applaud his National Missile Defense, which is the alpha and omega of his worldview. He made it clear that he couldn't stand Kim Dae Jung, the president of South Korea, whose vision of peace with North Korea complicates the rationalizations for the NMD, North Korea having been cited as a reliable source of an unannounced missile. On the other hand, he's a fan of Vladimir Putin, the ex-KGB president of Russia, whose soul he glimpsed at their first meeting. His new soulmate is in accord with the Bush view of the ABM Treaty, which some people regard as the last standing pillar of arms control and which Bush and Putin see as no big deal. In the Bush way of life, there is no room for participatory democracy, a euphemism for the common people's failure to mind their own business, and to leave the heavy lifting to Uncle Dick Cheney, the country club and the Pentagon. It was a phenomenon that drove Richard Nixon crazy during the Vietnam War. Bush asks nothing of the electorate -- no sacrifices, no deep thinking about the character or direction of the country. The good citizen, to him, is the quiet citizen, who kicks back and enjoys his tax rebate check, loves his SUV and hang the gas mileage, turns down his thermostat so the temperature in his family room rivals that of the Arctic.
George W. Bush's ideal citizen doesn't read a lot of books -- that's for the little woman, and she can worry about arsenic in drinking water,
too. Civic spirit is the last thing Bush is looking for. It's too bad, because there's a lot of it around, just waiting to be summoned, as he
would know if he got out of his bubble and noticed that young people are doing unprecedented amounts of community work and expect
nothing in return but the satisfaction of having done something worthwhile. |

|
The Pentagon and the Bush administration are determined to sell the American people a national missile defense
system that will probably increase tensions with allies and adversaries and will surely cost more than $100 billion.
Their latest marketing exercise took place on the evening of July 14, when a "kill vehicle" launched from the
Kwajalein Atoll in the Pacific smashed into a rocket sent up from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California.
Precisely according to plan, the target was instantly vaporized on impact -- and along with it, or so the Pentagon's
uniformed salesmen hoped, the perennial concern that missile defense won't work. With the cooperation of major
news organizations and conservative pundits, that test provided an enormous propaganda boost to the Bush
proposal, which conveniently enough had been brought up to Capitol Hill by Defense Department officials just two
days earlier.
There was only one thing that all the happy salesmen forgot to mention about their latest test drive. The rocket fired
from Vandenberg was carrying a global positioning satellite beacon that guided the kill vehicle toward it. In other
words, it would be fair to say that the $100 million test was rigged.
No wonder, then, that Lt. Gen. Ronald Kadish, the Air Force officer who oversees the NMD program, told the
Washington Post on the eve of the test that he was "quietly confident" about the outcome. The general knew about
the GPS beacon, while the reporters didn't. This rather significant aspect of the July 14 mission remained hidden in
the fine print until a few days ago, when the Pentagon confirmed the role of the GPS device to a reporter for
Defense Week magazine. But of course most Americans still don't know why the test functioned so smoothly,
because the Defense Week scoop was either buried or ignored by the mainstream media, which had so obediently
celebrated the technological breakthrough two weeks earlier. And as Kadish later acknowledged, each of the
previous three tests -- two of which failed anyway -- had also involved the use of a guidance beacon. (To longtime
observers of the missile-defense effort, this latest news recalled the notorious "Star Wars" scandal, when
investigators discovered that a target had been secretly heated to ensure that it would be picked up by the
interceptor's infrared sensor.)
Reuters was among the few news organizations that bothered to cover the Defense Week story. The wire service
quoted a Pentagon official who "conceded that real warheads in an attack would not carry such helpful beacons."
Probably not, although we can always hope that the Iranians or the North Koreans or the Chinese will attach to each
incoming nuke a loudspeaker that screams "come and get me!"
Unfortunately, weapons experts agree that even the most primitive enemy missiles are more likely to carry a very
different kind of accessory, namely, decoys designed to fool the computerized sensors aboard the kill vehicle.
While the missile launched from Vandenberg on July 14 did spit out a single Mylar balloon as a symbolic decoy, that
scarcely challenged the kill vehicle's capacity to select the correct target -- particularly because there was no GPS
beacon on that shiny balloon. In real warfare, an incoming missile is expected to deploy multiple decoys of varying
shapes and sizes to lure the kill vehicle astray. Past tests have indicated that these simple fakes work far more
reliably than the complex technology designed to detect them.
Eventually, the truth about the inherent problems of national missile defense may emerge in congressional hearings.
But meanwhile, the Pentagon and the Bush White House mean to stifle any dissent about the capabilities of their
favorite toy. They have repeatedly sought to reclassify documents that show that the system doesn't function as
advertised. And within the past few weeks, they have blatantly attempted to intimidate Theodore Postol, a professor
at Massachusetts Institute of Technology who is the country's leading critic of missile defense.
In early July, according to the Chronicle of Higher Education, Defense Department officials asked MIT to confiscate
the reclassified report from Postol and to "investigate [his] actions." At first MIT president Charles Vest, no doubt
worried about millions of dollars in defense research grants to his university, moved to comply with that request.
Only when Postol protested publicly did MIT back down.
Bogus tests and bullied critics are the hallmarks of a defense establishment that fears facts. With billions in
contracts at stake and bellicose ideologues in power, the salesmen for national missile defense must conceal the
many defects in their dangerous product. And the press corps, reverting to the bad habits of the Cold War, has done
little so far to penetrate the Pentagon's propaganda. "A dictatorship would be a heck of a lot easier, there's no question about it."
|
Apetown, My Hometown Maureen Dowd LOS ANGELES - I needed a break from politics. Just a short spell on the West Coast, soaking up some plastic culture and Botox glamour. No thoughts of Washington at all. No cravings for Rummy. No achings for Ashcroft. It was so relaxing on the Pacific, I even decided to play hooky Friday and go to the first show of "Planet of the Apes." My column was due in a few hours, but the future was written in pink neon. Anything seemed possible. I settled in with my popcorn as Mark Wahlberg's astronaut jumped in his Delta pod and shot into space, calling out "Never send a monkey to do a man's job." He is propelled through time and space and crash lands on the Planet of the Apes. As Mark ran around the jungle chased by snarling simians, I began feeling anxious. Apetown seemed strangely, disturbingly familiar: evolution hurtling backward. Progress in reverse. An arrogant determination to trash the compacts governing humans. "Do-gooders," one monkey sniffs. "Who needs 'em?" When Tim Roth as the human-hating chimpanzee army general announced "Extremism in defense of apes is no vice," I suddenly got a creepy feeling that I had been there. Was Apetown Washington? Was the Planet of the Apes the Bush White House? Hmmmm, so W. is President Primate. This was not only a Tim Burton fantasy, it was America's scariest reality show. W.'s second trip to Europe reinforced his hollow hubris. He gladhanded the European leaders even as he thumbed his nose at their treaties. "I know what I believe," he said as he visited the Roman Forum, "and I believe what I believe is right." Like the monkey planet, Washington looks more and more menacing and antediluvian, with the Bushies beating their chests and growling. In 2000, America seemed to be moving along briskly into the future, cooperating with the rest of the world on international issues, trying to clean up the environment and keep the threat of nuclear war tamped down. Then the retread Bush crowd swept in and flung us into the same sort of time warp that swallowed Mark Wahlberg. The president is plunging ahead or behind with his technologically suspect Star Wars defense system, intending to vitiate the ABM treaty and putting China and Russia on edge and into a closer alliance. He pressed forward or backward last week with his plan to kill Kyoto, turning America into the haughty sole holdout as 178 other nations agreed to implement the treaty to fight global warming —as usual, offering no alternative approach. Playing to its favorite audience of big business and gun owners, the administration last week blew off a U.N. plan to enforce an international ban on biological weapons and recently pressured the U.N. to weaken a pact to stem the illegal flow of small arms, from handguns to shoulder-launched rockets. The administration has no interest in the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, banning all nuclear test explosions, and is expected to reject the treaty banning land mines. W. and his Gerald Ford-era warlords —befogged in a cloud of nuclear waste, carbon dioxide, arsenic and coal dust —never meet an old idea they don't like. Even some hidebound Republicans in Congress find the Bush White House too far down on the evolutionary scale. On Thursday, senators from both parties upbraided E.P.A. administrator Christie Whitman, and said that if the Bushies refused to act on climate change, they would take matters into their own hands and come up with their own plan. And on Friday, the House, with some Republicans going against the president, voted to prevent the Bush administration from easing rules on the levels of arsenic in drinking water. There was even talk last week that the White House might pull out of a U.N. conference on racism. During the campaign, W. wouldn't come out firmly in favor of teaching evolution over creationism. That should have been our clue that he's unwilling to evolve. He is so mired in the past, he almost seems antagonistic toward the future.
Without giving away the ending of the new version of the classic collision-of-species movie, I can tell you there's a chilling
scene set in Washington. It shows what can happen when the guys in charge monkey around in the wrong direction. |
|
GOP Reactionaries In Charge Of Reproductive Health Policies By Ceci Connolly The Bush administration is making a fundamental change in how the federal government approaches issues involving reproductive health, scaling back efforts to promote family planning and contraception while aggressively promoting "abstinence-only" programs. Since taking office, President Bush and top aides have refused to allow states to expand family planning services for poor women, reimposed a ban on abortion counseling at overseas health clinics, released a report questioning the effectiveness of condoms and proposed eliminating mandatory contraceptive coverage for federal employees. Most recently, an ordained Catholic deacon working in the Department of Health and Human Services raised questions about a program developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to help parents talk to youngsters about sexual health because he believes it runs counter to the Catholic beliefs of HHS Secretary Tommy G. Thompson. At the same time, administration officials are considering plans to consolidate women's health offices and have moved swiftly to boost funding for "abstinence-only" sexual education programs, with the money often going to evangelical Christian groups. Every new administration brings its partisan politics and governing philosophy to Washington, and Bush is in many ways simply following through on campaign promises. But public health experts inside and outside the federal government are becoming increasingly concerned that the emerging approach is based more on ideology than science, and that the changes may set back recent successes in reducing teen pregnancies and the spread of sexually transmitted diseases such as AIDS. "At each instance, he has chosen to act not in a moderate way but in an extreme way," said Judith L. Lichtman, president of the National Partnership for Women and Families. Administration officials defend their approach, saying the president is committed to reducing teen pregnancy and the spread of sexually transmitted diseases, and broadening access to medical care. The new tack is more practical and is aimed at correcting the previous administration's policies, which were skewed too far to the left, officials said. "If Planned Parenthood wanted it, the previous administration favored it," White House spokesman Ari Fleischer said. Both sides are anxious to see how Bush handles upcoming decisions on whether the federal government should fund embryonic stem cell research, a proposal to designate "an unborn child" as a person eligible for federal health insurance and attempts to eliminate abortion services for women in prisons or in the military. Congress is also waiting for the White House to weigh in on legislation restricting access to the abortion pill RU-486 and the Unborn Victims of Violence Act, a House-passed bill making it a federal crime to harm a fetus during an attack on a woman. Last week, Rep. James C. Greenwood (R-Pa.) complained to Thompson and White House counselor Karl Rove about proposed changes in the Medicaid program to designate the fetus as a person while simultaneously rejecting requests to broaden family planning. "There's no question that religious conservatives have a very significant impact on this administration," he said. Most of the controversy has emanated from HHS, a department described as "ground zero for the ideological wars in this country" by Kevin Keane, Thompson's top political strategist. Dennis Smith, who oversees state Medicaid programs as head of HHS's Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services, designed the proposal to guarantee Medicaid coverage for fetuses. Department spokesmen said the goal was to expand prenatal care for poor women, but public health experts, noting that there were other ways to accomplish that, described Smith's language as a backdoor attempt by antiabortion activists to establish a legal precedent protecting the unborn. Smith, a former Reagan administration official who worked to prevent health providers from offering abortion counseling, was also largely responsible for a new HHS policy rejecting requests by Georgia and New York to provide family planning to more poor women. Many state officials -- including Thompson, then governor of Wisconsin -- applied for the waivers after seeing other states post notable improvements. The most dramatic case was California, where Republican Gov. Pete Wilson abandoned his Education Now and Babies Later abstinence program in favor of a Medicaid waiver for comprehensive family planning. During 1997-98, researchers found that the program prevented 108,000 unwanted pregnancies, including 50,000 unintended births, 41,000 abortions and 15,000 miscarriages. The state saved more than $512 million in prenatal and birthing costs. Peggy Handrich, administrator of the Wisconsin Division of Health Care Financing, said that when she received a call from Washington warning that Wisconsin will not be allowed to develop a similar program, she was "very disappointed." Family planning services, she said, "help women make good decisions about their lives." Smith did not return phone calls, but Keane said HHS is trying to find a compromise allowing states to expand family planning services in conjunction with primary care. HHS officials said the rejection of New York's and Wisconsin's waivers was not specifically because they were for family planning; instead, the department had decided it would no longer approve waivers for only one type of health service and was encouraging states to apply for comprehensive waivers covering all types of service. When Surgeon General David Satcher released a report touting sex education that included discussions of abstinence and contraception, White House officials quickly distanced themselves from the study and began circulating names of a possible replacement. Last week, officials at the CDC and National Institutes of Health tried in vain to halt release of a report that concluded there was "insufficient evidence" that condoms prevented most sexually transmitted infections. Former representative Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) seized upon the report to demand the resignation of CDC Director Jeffrey P. Koplan for propagating a "safe-sex myth." Health care providers, meanwhile, warned that the report was dangerously misleading. Although condoms may not protect against certain infections that can be transmitted through the skin, they protect against diseases spread through bodily fluids, said Bernadine Healy, who headed the NIH in the first Bush administration. "Just because it doesn't protect against everything doesn't mean it's not effective and useful," she said. The debate over how to prevent teen pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases such as AIDS has sparked the greatest passions. In February 2000, a group named Advocates for Youth developed a package of videos and pamphlets guiding parents on how to discuss sexual health with their children. The CDC paid the group $200,000 for the materials, which were to be offered through its Business Responds to AIDS program. Last fall, CDC staffers forwarded the packets to HHS, where a career civil servant named Boyd Work, a deacon, detailed his objections in an e-mail. "You should know that the secretary is a devout Roman Catholic. . . . Do you think he'll buy off on the nature and scope of the content?" he wrote. "Advocates for Youth, on their Web site and in their press releases, are ardent critics of the Bush administration. Mmmm." On Friday, Keane said that the e-mail was withdrawn and that he would review the materials. Thompson "is not an ideologue; he's a pragmatist," Keane said. In the meantime, youngsters remain at risk, said James Wagoner, president of Advocates for Youth. "In the seven months the administration has held up this project, nearly 12,000 young people have contracted HIV in this country." Rick Williams, a former Polaroid executive who was part of the development team, said workers "are desperate for help in talking to their children. This is badly needed." Keane and other administration officials did not dispute the new emphasis on abstinence education, despite limited data on whether the approach is effective. The last administration was "slanted toward other options, like condoms," he said. "Abstinence hasn't been given the same level of attention; that's our goal. The word used is 'parity.' " For the current fiscal year, Congress approved a $20 million increase in funding for abstinence-only programs. Next year, funding would rise by $30 million. Bush administration officials say their goal is to spend $135 million annually on abstinence education, which would match current spending for family planning. At the same time, the administration has proposed no increase in spending for traditional family planning programs. "We're getting nothing but support from the Bush administration," said Leslee J. Unruh, president of the National Abstinence Clearinghouse. "He has personally talked to me about doing anything and everything he can to support abstinence-until-marriage education." In Chattanooga, organizers of the Why kNOw abstinence program were celebrating news they had received a $254,000 federal grant. "Our falling pregnancy rate in this country is directly measurable to when the program began," Assistant Director Marcia Swearingen said. "I know it's not scientific, but we're encouraged." At the Hamilton County public health offices, Tammy Burke speculated that the drop was due to the abstinence education in Chattanooga and distribution of Depo Provera, a contraceptive injected in women every three months.
This weekend, when several hundred abstinence advocates gathered for a conference in Miami, they were greeted
with an effusive letter from Bush. "Abstinence is not just about saying 'no,' " he wrote. "It's about saying yes to a
happier, healthier future." |

|
A wise friend recently offered the reminder that the best weapon anyone can bring to bear upon that which they oppose is a
long memory.
I was fifteen years old in 1987, working behind the snack bar of a public golf course. A battered old television was propped
up in the corner, and it was on all the time during the Iran-Contra hearings. I pulled sodas and served coffee and shot the
breeze with the regulars, and I watched every damned minute of those hearings.
It is then, I think, that the first true stirrings of my current political ideology rose up and peered with furrowed eyebrows at Lt.
Colonel Oliver North. I was young, and not able to understand fully the scope and magnitude of what was happening. Despite
that, it was clear to me, and from what I could tell it was likewise clear to the nation, that something had gone fundamentally
wrong in the White House.
And then, of course, the wheels came off. The hearings degenerated into long, lazy afternoons filled with softball questions
tossed up to North and his lawyers. Hunter Thompson best described the scene in 'Generation of Swine':
"By the end of the Thursday session, North had been fed so many home run balls that he and his lawyer were laughing out
loud and slapping each other on the back every time Nields asked a question - and then North would give another 20 minute
speech about how much he loved his wife and his children and his uniform and, above all, his commander-in-chief, The
President."
North was a hero, the hearings went seemingly nowhere, Reagan served out his term, and later on a number of the leading
lights within the scandal were given Presidential pardons by George Herbert Walker Bush. I finished out the summer at the
course and proceeded to grow up, a bit wiser for having watched it all unfold.
That boy has grown into a man who happens to have become a teacher of history. It is my job to recall with alacrity the
details and individuals that have coursed through our national events. Simply put, I get paid to have that long memory. I
remember Iran-Contra.
I remember the Walsh Report, and have read it many times. It can be found here:
http://www.fas.org/irp/offdocs/walsh/
The Walsh Report describes the whole sordid deal rather succinctly in its Executive Summary, which reads in part below:
"The Iran/contra affair concerned two secret Reagan Administration policies whose operations were coordinated by National
Security Council staff. The Iran operation involved efforts in 1985 and 1986 to obtain the release of Americans held hostage
in the Middle East through the sale of U.S. weapons to Iran, despite an embargo on such sales. The contra operations from
1984 through most of 1986 involved the secret governmental support of contra military and paramilitary activities in
Nicaragua, despite congressional prohibition of this support.
"The Iran and contra operations were merged when funds generated from the sale of weapons to Iran were diverted to support
the contra effort in Nicaragua. Although this 'diversion' may be the most dramatic aspect of Iran/contra, it is important to
emphasize that both the Iran and contra operations, separately, violated United States policy and law. The ignorance of the
'diversion' asserted by President Reagan and his Cabinet officers on the National Security Council in no way absolves them
of responsibility for the underlying Iran and contra operations."
So much good reading here for an historian! So much to remember. What the Walsh Report does not speak to, what it
glosses over, are the wretched facts of our involvement in Central America during this time. This omission is pressing today,
because the ghosts of Iran-Contra have come back to haunt us.
John Dimitri Negroponte stands today as the nominee to represent the United States at the U.N. Negroponte is currently the
Executive Vice President for Global Markets at McGraw Hill Companies, Inc., and served for 37 years with the United States
Department of State as a career diplomat.
One of his diplomatic postings was as the American Ambassador to Honduras. He served there from 1981 to 1985, at the
height of the Iran-Contra actions taking place in Central America. If nominated, Negroponte will join Elliot Abrams in the
governmental service. Abrams was convicted of lying to Congress for his role in covering up the operation for the President
and Vice President.
Eyewitness accounts have allowed us, with the passage of time, to understand the horrors that occurred in Honduras
because of the direct actions of the Reagan administration. Eyewitness accounts tell us what Negroponte and Abrams surely
knew at the time.
One such eyewitness is Sister Laetitia Bordes, a nun who worked in Central America during the 1980s and the 1990s. She
has written a book entitled 'Our Hearts Were Broken.' Sister Bordes describes Honduras and Ambassador Negroponte in
words we all need to hear:
"My mind went back to May 1982 and I saw myself facing Negroponte in his office at the US Embassy in Tegucigalpa. I had
gone to Honduras on a fact-finding delegation. We were looking for answers. Thirty-two women had fled the death squads of
El Salvador after the assassination of Archbishop Oscar Romero in 1980 to take refuge in Honduras. One of them had been
Romero's secretary.
"Some months after their arrival, these women were forcibly taken from their living quarters in Tegucigalpa, pushed into a van
and disappeared. Our delegation was in Honduras to find out what had happened to these women. John Negroponte listened
to us as we exposed the facts. There had been eyewitnesses to the capture and we were well read on the documentation
that previous delegations had gathered.
"Negroponte denied any knowledge of the whereabouts of these women. He insisted that the US Embassy did not interfere in
the affairs of the Honduran government and it would be to our advantage to discuss the matter with the latter.
"Facts, however, reveal quite the contrary. During Negroponte's tenure, US military aid to Honduras grew from $4 million to
$77.4 million; the US launched a covert war against Nicaragua and mined its harbors, and the US trained Honduran military to
support the Contras.
"John Negroponte worked closely with General Alvarez, Chief of the Armed Forces in Honduras, to enable the training of
Honduran soldiers in psychological warfare, sabotage, and many types of human rights violations, including torture and
kidnapping. Honduran and Salvadoran military were sent to the School of the Americas to receive training in
counter-insurgency directed against people of their own country.
"The CIA created the infamous Honduran Intelligence Battalion 3-16 that was responsible for the murder of many Sandinistas.
General Luis Alonso Discua Elvir, a graduate of the School of the Americas, was a founder and commander of Battalion 3-16.
In 1982, the US negotiated access to airfields in Honduras and established a regional military training center for Central
American forces, principally directed at improving fighting forces of the Salvadoran military.
"In 1994, the Honduran Human Rights Commission outlined the torture and disappearance of at least 184 political opponents.
It also specifically accused John Negroponte of a number of human rights violations. Yet, back in his office that day in 1982,
John Negroponte assured us that he had no idea what had happened to the women we were looking for.
"I had to wait 13 years to find out. In an interview with the Baltimore Sun in 1996, Jack Binns, Negroponte's predecessor as
US ambassador in Honduras, told how a group of Salvadorans, among whom were the women we had been looking for, were
captured on April 22, 1981, and savagely tortured by the DNI, the Honduran Secret Police, before being placed in helicopters
of the Salvadoran military. After take off from the airport in Tegucigalpa, the victims were thrown out of the helicopters. Four
children had been captured with the women.
"They were turned over to the Salvadoran military and their whereabouts are unknown. Binns told the Baltimore Sun that the
North American authorities were well aware of what had happened and that it was a grave violation of human rights. But it was
seen as part of Ronald Reagan's counterinsurgency policy."
There are still many threads from Iran-Contra waving in the wind. To be sure, a vital area of interest is the sudden and
irreversible incapacitation of CIA Head William Casey. Casey knew where the bodies were buried, and who knew what, and
when. But Casey was delivered insensate to his Maker without ever having The Questions put to him under oath.
Someday, perhaps, we will know the whole ugly truth. We will finally understand what Reagan meant to America.
In the meantime, we must rise up as one voice and denounce in the strongest terms the nomination of John Negroponte to be
our Ambassador to the United Nations. Such a man, with such a bloody history, can not be allowed to represent this nation
before a body that stands for the protection of human rights.
Our reputation on the world stage is tarnished enough as it is. We rush pell-mell towards the status of full-fledged pariah. At
the very least, the nomination of Negroponte would further sully our flag. At worst, the nomination of Negroponte would wipe
away some of the darkest crimes ever committed by any American administration in all of our history.
It cannot happen. Call your Senators, your Congressional representatives. Call the head of the Democratic Party in your
state.
Call them, and tell them: I remember John Negroponte
|

|
Howl 2000
I saw the best minds of my generation destroyed by madness, starving hysterical naked,
dragging themselves through the negro streets at dawn looking for an angry fix...
who passed through universities...among the scholars of war...[and] were
expelled...for [writing] crazy...odes on the windows of the skull,
who talked continuously seventy hours from park to pad to bar to Bellevue
to museum to the Brooklyn Bridge...
who threw their watches off the roof to cast their ballot for Eternity outside of
Time, & alarm clocks fell on their heads every day for the next decade...
with the absolute heart of the poem of life butchered out of their own bodies
good to eat a thousand years.
For many who voted in November's presidential election, the outcome of the protest, contest, and cinematic multiplex of
court cases created occasion for another communal primal howl - one that continues to echo, and seems to grow even
stronger with each taunt to "Get over it" or the shrug, "Maybe it won't be so bad" (a hopeful notion disproven with each
day's new headlines). As revelations continue to surface about the machinations of the Supreme Court and the
"irregularities" in Florida, with its 25 decisive electoral votes, incredulity still mounts that an election should be so decided in
the home of democracy, a country that has helped other countries run free, fair elections.
While the vote was close - with Al Gore clear winner of the popular vote (and according to later statistical sampling and
analyses, almost certainly the Florida majority as well) - some groups unquestionably stood to fare far worse under a
Republican administration, particularly this one, than others: the poor, people of color, women, gays, the "usual suspects"
in terms of society's unprotected and dispossessed - the people described by both parties (one more cynically than the other)
as those "left behind." Not to mention those who cared about little things like the environment and health care.
It's still hard for many of us to comprehend, given his ceaseless mangling of facts and numbers, his lysdexic speech, the
abysmal Texas record, and his campaign centerpiece - returning wealth to the wealthy - how Bush gained almost half the
vote. The pundits simply labeled him "more likable." Well, most of us usual suspects found Gore plenty likable.
In any event, whether one voted for Gore, Bush, or the late Pat Paulsen, there is one Inalienable Truth about election 2000.
As a result of the Supreme Court's unprecedented stay of the efficient, deadline-minded Florida count - on a Saturday no
less, reeking of real desperation - and its subsequent eleventh-hour refusal to allow the vote count to resume there, Bush
passed into the history books, and what now increasingly seems the Fright House, as our nation's first President-Select
instead of President-Elect. The means by which this result was attained should alarm - indeed, enrage - all of us.
If you were a Bush supporter, remember: The precedent has been set, however unlawfully. So next time, the "election"
might just be decided despite your vote and tens of thousands of others by the once-Supreme, now Supremacist, Court as
well. And that is not democracy.
HOWL 2000
I saw the best minds of my time drawn by degrees like plants to
sunshine, finally fully facing one once considered a mannequin man,
who'd stood stiffly behind the president at least a thousand times, for
a thousand photo-ops, a Tussaud's figure in his backstage role,
who'd been thought made of wood and a tree-hugger, too, just a place
where smart sap ran (a putative Pinocchio, conservatives smeared), but
who emerged from the shadows, flesh and blood, a man of ideas and ideals,
during his drive to serve the U.S. as president after eight years as veep:
who found his full true voice at his party's convention, "tree" limbs moving fluidly
around the stage, speaking his own words from his own homegrown roots.
Yes, this was his "own man": Al Gore himself on stage.
People slouching on couches, half-dozing before TVs, began to sit up and
listen. Undecideds decided; lukewarm liberals warmed up, many growing
red-hot. With his mastery of the finest detail and his big-picture view, Al
could make the numbers dance as skillfully as angels on the tip of
a pin, balancing programs as myriad as the military and Medicare.
No "fuzz" in his math, or from his mouth.
Gore was The Goods: Vietnam without dodge, working journalist in a job
Daddy didn't buy, over 20 years in the House, the Senate, the White House.
And, unlike Clinton, he was unimpeachable (segue here to: "The Kiss").
In the opposite corner of the ring lurked and smirked a bantamweight,
born George W. Bush but known as Dubya and dubbed Dumbya by
some for his idiosyncrasies of speech and mind, the painful twisting of
neurons, his ignorance of politics both domestic and foreign. "W" had
limited credentials, light as feathers, one job botch after another - but
his connections: heavyweight. Said the name "Bush" was his best gift.
He claimed early that brother Jeb had "guaranteed" him Florida, a battle-
ground with 25 victory-votes. We thought it was bluster, metaphor; we
were clueless. Jeb and co-conspirator Katherine Harris, head of every
aspect of the state's elections, labored hard to ensure DUI Dumbya
his believed Bush Birthright.
Harris's job included verifying the accuracy and consistency of all state
polls, yet - tsk, tsk - the rate of "undervotes" (hanging chads, tricorner,
trimester, swinging) would prove more than twice as high, often obscenely
higher, in poor (Democrat, minority, working-class) counties. These votes
could be read by hand (state law) but not by the machines - as the machines'
maker later testified in court; finding of fact. When he'd sold the machines, the
manufacturer had explained to elections officials the necessity of hand counts
in any close election; this one was hair's-breadth. Harris knew
underpunches HAD to be counted. Jeb too. But "wouldn't be prudent. Not
at this juncture."
Like few of her peers, Harris had also taken the initiative of vetting Florida's
voter rolls (almost alone in the U.S. these listed both race and party) of
"felons" (read "blacks"), actually paying a Republican firm to flense the rolls
in carefully selected areas, purging the names of thousands of African-
Americans and white Democrats, the majority of whom had never so much as
received a parking ticket, or who once committed a trivial misdemeanor (not
affecting voting rights), and yes, even a few real ex-cons - who'd done their
time, done parole, whose citizenship rights had long been restored.
But not on the lists Harris fed at the last minute to the counties.
Bush's own convention was triumphant street theater with its "inclusion
illusion," a hallful of Stetsons, with confetti and balloons raining down so hard
they masked the lack of gist, giddily creating the sensation of early V-Day.
W didn't pen a word of his own 17-draft speech - his aides had long known
better than to let him talk unscripted! - and his Teleprompted hollow bones were
a stark contrast to Al's lone laptop self-composition of spirited meat.
The weeks before the election offered a seasick seesaw, a swash, of poll
numbers: Gore up 4 today, Bush up 5 the next. Graphs whose line crossed,
intersected, moving like waves - yet all within the margins of error. A wash.
When Election Day dawned, voter protests were not far behind the sun's
rising and the polls' opening - first in Palm Beach, where butterflies flew
in the skies, overpunched for Gore, and fluttered - 19K! - into trashcans. Streets
filled in Palm and wherever people of color and other registered voters were
turned away from polls on creative pretexts in violation of state and U.S. law.
By Election Night, battlegrounds fell like dominos to Gore, but one state
became a moving question mark (follow the bouncing ball - red? blue? still
white?). At first the anchormen called Florida for Al; then for W;
then the numbers began snaking - in one county a glitch quickly
transmogrified a Gore lead into an impossible MINUS 16K votes - and the
increasingly irritated newsmen finally called it "too close to call," where it
remained for the next day's headlines, and the next's, and the next's.
A Satyricon of images followed - surreal people, surreal events - and hooked
round-the-clock MSNBC junkies hungry for any news fix... In Palm,
besides the 2-punch flutter-byebyes was the seeming emergence of a "Jews for
Buchanan" movement (the Hitler fan, whose punchhole lined up directly with
the Gore-Lieberman box, said himself those votes weren't his)...It took
days to learn the inaccuracy of the machines in poorer districts, disproportionately
affecting people of color. Though the undervotes required hand counts, some
counties were advised that these were non-votes; thus, thousands of votes
were simply tossed out, 27K in one black county alone...Still, Bush co-chair Harris -
vampire blood-red lipstick on her Machiavellian maw - refused to recuse or to count,
certifying a W victory with an alleged +500 surplus, a witch in hurried heat.
A convoy of Ryder trucks, as syrup-slow as O.J.'s Broncho chase, ordered to
carry tens of thousands of ballots to a judge who then never looked at one,
not even out of idle curiosity...Once-statesman James Baker III controlling the
Ministry of Disinformation, distorting facts like a funhouse mirror, accusing
Gore of prolonging Indecision 2000 by resorting to court instead of concession,
when Bush was first to file, on "equal protection" grounds (along with
disenfranchised voters, on "unequal rejection" grounds)...The paid mob,
toting flurries of professionally (and speedily) printed "Sore Loserman" signs,
breaking down the doors of the Miami-Dade courthouse counthouse, rabid as Nazi
youth, baring emotions and teeth (and signs) only Bush-backing money
could buy...and given bullhorns, peripatetic in their usefulness, from Miami to
the Supreme Court steps, where one Republican with a horn could drown out
the voices of 50 asking only that votes be counted, to the VP's mansion, where
Tipper and the VoteWinner heard day and night, "Get out of Cheney's house!"
(Uncle Duke's "compassionate fascism," per Garry Trudeau, or just fascism?)
At last the courts, from Martin to Tallahassee, with Bush lead lawyer Barry
Richard looking the Angel of Death (a white toupee?), while David Boies,
best and brightest in the nation, toiled endlessly pro bono for Al. Believing.
Finally, W got his stay and his day in court. When the Supremes sang, we saw
under their dark robes not 7 sets of wingtips & 2 of low-heel pumps, but instead
5 pair of plank-thick elephant jackboots and 4 of lawful, nimbler, dissenting feet.
The song the Supremes sang was not sweet. Five-four, it had no harmony;
it had no beat. Elephants stomped: "We Rule (this time) That Votes Do Not Count;
Knowing What the Votes Say, Oyez, We Rule: Do NOT Count Those Votes."
The date was 12/12/00. File it in your mind as infamous as December 7, as
horrific as November 22. Remember The Maine? Remember THE Florida.
All the hearts and minds that had turned toward Gore like sunlight
broke, snapped like dry twigs, after the dark dealings in the "sunshine" state.
The court's ruling marked a lethal precedent, an illegal president, and the
culmination of an "election" in which one state's Macbeth-like executive branch,
its legislative, branch (postmark: Austin), and the nation's judicial branch alike
chose to substitute their own personal, partisan preferences for those of
actual voters to pick the winner in the make-or-break state and thus the U.S.
Disbelief still runs like tears. See the
uncounted ballots in our outstretched hands, chads hanging
from our mouths like rotten teeth...
and the absolute heart of the Founders' poem of democracy
butchered out of our souls and America's,
with damage deep enough to last a thousand years. |
|
Dead Letter Office
Heil Bush,
Dear Propaganda Ansager Roberts,
Congratulations you have just been awarded the Vidkun Quisling Award for 2001. Your name will now live throughout history with such past award winners as Marcus Junius Brutus, Judas Iscariot, Benedict Arnold, Vidkun Quisling and last year's winner Volksjudge Antoni (light-fingers) Scalia.
Without your help shilling for us, spinning the truth, telling out right lies and ignoring the real news, holding onto power after our Coup D' Etat would have been impossible. With the help of our mutual friends, the other "Media Whores," you have made it possible for all of us to goose-step off to a brave new bank account.
Along with this award there will be an Iron Cross 2nd class presented by our glorious Fuhrer Herr Bush at a gala celebration in der Wolf's Lair (formerly Rancho de Bimbo) on 9-03-2001. We salute you Frau Roberts! Sieg Heil!
Signed,
Heil Bush
|
|
If only he'd waited 'til next year -- the Washington press corps can't
remember anything longer than six months. But Rove has cut it too
fine this time -- people are just now getting their rebate checks and
hearing that Social Security is a disaster area at the same time.
Furthermore, the peppy idea of putting Social Security money into
the stock market doesn't look all that good since the market has
lost about $3 trillion in the current downtown. Pfffft! Hey, let's put our
retirement money into that sucker and watch it shrink!
The Bush commission has the singular distinction of being
comprised entirely of people who already agreed with George W.
Bush that Social Security needs to be privatized. Let me count the
ways this is a truly bad idea.
One (and this is the leading reason for proposing this daft notion in
the first place), it will take a huge amount of money out of Social
Security and put it into Wall Street brokerage firms. You know how
brokers work: They make money when you buy, and they make
money when you sell. A no-lose proposition for them. Literally
billions in commissions await them, and that's the lobby that's
pushing the privatization scheme.
Social Security happens to be run at a miniscule administrative
cost (yes, government does do some things right). If we break off
some of the money into private accounts, administrative costs and
brokerage fees will eat more of our money.
Second, you know perfectly well a lot of people will get ripped off if
they control their own retirement money. Older people are
particularly vulnerable to con artists --- it'll be a gold mine for gold
mines, diamond finds and every other cockamamie, pie-in-the-sky
scheme that's ever come along. Think only the feeble-minded will
lose? Who lost money in high tech? Wasn't it all those brilliant
young hotshots we kept hearing about? Wasn't it the NASDAQ that
went down 60 percent?
Then there is the unhappy set of matching numbers to be
considered. The Bush tax cut (35 percent to the richest 1 percent of
the people) will eventually cost about $170 billion in annual
revenues. The estimated SS shortfall by 2038 comes to $180
billion. Maybe if you invest your $300 rebate (setting aside the 28
percent of you who aren't getting any money and the other 12
percent who will get less than $300) in the stock market, you'll be
able to retire in a few years. But don't count on it.
You will hear more lies, damn lies and statistics about the state of
Social Security in the coming months and years than even Mark
Twin could have dreamed of. The Social Security trustees, on
whose numbers the Bush commission relied, are using an
exceedingly grim forecast. Nevertheless, it makes more sense to
use those forecasts than to use Rosy Scenario and assume
there's nothing we need to do about it.
According to the experts at the Center on Budget and Policy
Priorities, and everybody else, we do have real, long-term
problems with Social Security that need to be addressed now, but
we are nowhere near a crisis -- and the crunch is further out than
the Bush commission says. Republicans have traditionally
accused Democrats of fear-mongering on Social Security.
Unfortunately, the Republicans have now taken it up.
The most unfortunate thing about the commission report is not just
that it's misleading, but that it further polarizes a debate that will
have to be solved by both parties. The commission announces
doom in 2016, because that's when the line of payroll tax receipts
crosses SS outgo, but they are not counting interest from the
enormous SS surplus, which should be by then $5 trillion. As Alan
Blinder, former vice chair at the Federal Reserve, said cheerfully
Wednesday, "That's not chopped liver."
Henry Aaron, author of an excellent book on Social Security and a
senior fellow at Brookings Institute, says our situation is like that of
a family saving for the college education of the kids. That education
may well cost more than the family's current income, but the two
things you do about it are to pay down the mortgage (the national
debt) and increase your savings. So by the time the kids get to
college, you're in financial shape to afford it.
Ken Apfel, former SS commissioner, says the good news politically
is that Congress is now treating Social Security as a separate
entity, rather than as part of the total federal budget. (Who said
"lockbox"?) But the Bush tax cut is so large it may tempt Congress
into using the Social Security surplus to finance government
operations, and then we would be in the soup. |

|
The curse went thus:
"Harrison will not win this year to be the Great Chief. But he may
win next year. If he does...He will not finish his term. He will die in
his office.'
'No president has ever died in office,' declared a visitor.
'But Harrison will die I tell you. And when he dies you will remember
my brother Tecumseh's death. You think that I have lost my powers.
I, who caused the sun to darken and Red Men to give up firewater.
But I tell you Harrison will die. And after him, every Great Chief
chosen every 20 years thereafter will die. And when each one dies, let
everyone remember the death of our people.'"
So, what exactly happened to Harrison, and how did The Prophet’s Curse play out? Let’s see -
After Harrison was elected in 1840, he caught a cold on inauguration day and died of pneumonia one month later.
Why haven't I heard anyone mention this lately? Did everyone think it ended with Reagan? Or is everyone paranoid
that they'll get a visit from Weak & Stupid's SS boys like Pensacola seamstress Margaret Richard did when she
sent her angry email to Florida legislator Rep. Allen Trovillion about his offensive anti-gay remarks.... and she cc'd
Smirk and younger Brother Jeb!
YOU GO MARGARET!
Personally, I don't think it ended with Ronnie. And being of Native American decent, Cherokee and Choctaw, (ok,
so my ancestors got busy on their way west from Scotland and Ireland), I tend to believe these things and take
them very seriously - I suppose the Celtic blood doesn't hurt either.
Yeah I know, he dodged Hinckley’s bullet, and yes, he's still alive. Physically. But mentally? Now, please
understand, I am not bashing an Alzheimer's victim. I have lived with it first hand. My father died from it last year.
And as anyone who has ever been witness to it's devastation will tell you - they are not the same person they once
were. They die mentally. It is literally the death of mental function, which finally leads to physical death. It is a
horror. You cannot even say goodbye to them. The person who loved you and remembered you is already gone.
(Daddy, I miss you, but I am very glad you aren’t here to see what they’re doing to the country you loved and fought
to protect.)
Ronald Reagan did die in office – just not physically. Remember how it got to the point he wasn’t making any
sense and they rarely let him speak in public?
So if the curse is still in full swing, and what on Earth has the United States government done to make the Native
American people, and the spirit of the Prophet for that matter, want to lift it? The real question beyond "is Smirk
actually alive?" Is this: Considering that Bush The Younger wasn’t elected, yet is our current Great Chief, who
does the curse claim jurisdiction over? Al Gore, although elected by The People, was not "chosen to be Great
Chief", that was done by The Hive of Five, who chose Twig. But is Twig really in charge? Is Cheney the clandestine
Great Chief?
I suppose time will tell…. Unless a further requirement of the Great Chief is to be human, which the curse is not
specific on, it only says "every Great Chief chosen", it doesn't even specify male or female. Either way, if humanity
is a requirement, I suppose Weak & Stupid and Uncle Dick are safe.
This edition we're proud to showcase the cartoons of Dan Wasserman |



|
To End On A Happy Note ... America Is So Sick Blues
Sung to the tune of "Subterranean Homesick Blues"
(instrumental intro)
Cheney's in his residence
Cheney comes heart broke
Get sick, get well
Allies scorned, you warned
|

|
Activist Alerts "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people to do nothing." ... Edmund Burke
Here's what you can do to help:
2. Contact your local and/or state Democratic Party office urging them to also
support the resolution.
3. Contribute to the Democratic Party of Oregon. We plan to continue to promote
this resolution and your contribution, no matter how small, will help us in this fight
for democracy. Click on Democratic Party of Oregon to send your support today!
Was it the worst Supreme Court decision in US history, as
American University Constitutional scholar Jamin Raskin has
suggested? Considering that Raskin is a staunch civil rights
advocate, the very thought that he would rank Bush v. Gore
lower than both the Dred Scott and Plessy rulings is instructive.
Nor does Raskin stand alone in his opinion of this judicial coup.
Justice John Paul Stevens: "One thing, however, is certain.
Although we may never know with complete certainty the identity
of the winner of this year's Presidential election, the identity of the
loser is perfectly clear. It is the Nation's confidence in the judge as
an impartial guardian of the rule of law. I respectfully dissent."
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg: "In sum, the Court's
conclusion that a constitutionally adequate recount is impractical is
a prophecy the Court's own judgment will not allow to be tested.
Such an untested prophecy should not decide the Presidency of the
United States. I dissent." And related is the unsigned per curiam
decision of the Scalia 5, a transparent attempt to try to avoid
history's scarlet letter.
Hendrik Hertzberg, former presidential speechwriter: "The
election of 2000 was not stolen. It was expropriated."
David Kairys, Temple University: "We had a constitutional
crisis, and it was Bush v. Gore. History will not be kind."
Suzanna Sherry, Vanderbilt University: "There is really very little way to reconcile this opinion other than that
they wanted Bush to win."
Jeffrey Rosen, legal scholar: "They have...made it impossible for citizens of the United States to sustain any
kind of faith in the rule of law as something larger than the self-interested political preferences of William
Rehnquist, Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, Anthony Kennedy, and Sandra Day O'Connor."
Randall Kennedy, Harvard University: "But we should also insist that there be no confirmation for Scalia-like
champions of the right-wing agenda. The Supreme Court has hurt its own reputation by wrongly intervening to
ensure the victory of George W. Bush. Those who abhor what the Court did should say so and say so loudly and
clearly."
Jesse Jackson and John Sweeney: "But if it comes down for justices to the 14th amendment and the promise
of equal protection, one can only hope for the sake of the country that they consider how not counting all the votes
mirrors too closely the habits of heart and mind that brought us slavery and segregation--the original sins of our
nation that the equal protection clause sought to repair."
And, of course, Vincent Bugliosi, prosecutor of Charles Manson and author of several bestselling true-crime
books, in The Betrayal of America: ". . . the Court committed the unpardonable sin of being a knowing surrogate
for the Republican Party instead of being an impartial arbiter of the law.... [The Court searched] mightily for a
way, any way at all, to aid their choice for president, Bush, in the suppression of the truth, finally settling, in their
judicial coup d'État, on the untenable argument that there was a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment's equal
protection clause..."
Recent polls indicate the public's growing dissatisfaction with the results of the Scalia Five's decision. A survey
conducted by the Pew Research Center and Princeton Survey Research Associates (June 13-17) showed George
W. Bush's job approval rating at just 50 percent, down six points from March; the New York Times survey with
CBS News (June 14-18) put the rating at 53 percent, down seven points from March. And Democracy Corps's
Greenberg Quinlan Rosner poll (June 11-13) found that 48 percent of likely voters think the nation is currently on
the "wrong track." Perhaps most tellingly, 25 percent of voters in the Democracy Corps poll said that the phrase
"not really elected President" describes Bush "very well," with another 15 percent saying that it describes him
"well"--in other words, six months after the Scalia Five coup, 40 percent of likely voters still believe Bush was not
really elected President.
What then, is to be done?
The least we can do is know our own history, and to understand that what the Injustices did was an insult to the
dreams and ideals of Lexington and Concord, Valley Forge and Jefferson and Paine, Gettsyburg and Lincoln and
Douglass, Selma and King, Seneca Falls and Anthony, Delano and Chavez, Flint and Debs and Lewis. We can
bear witness to injustice, in the nonviolent protest tradition of Thoreau, Gandhi, King, Havel, Robinson, Chavez.
The Scalia Five's judicial coup came down on the second Tuesday last December. So, on the second Tuesday of
July, July 10, 2001, the Tuesday after the Pro-Democracy Convention in Philadelphia, the Tuesday between
Independence Day and Bastille Day, the Institute for Policy Studies and friends are calling for a peaceful,
nonviolent vigil at the Supreme Court building, at noon.
On July 10--and each Tuesday at noon from then on--let's gather at the scene of the crime, and bear witness to the
truth. The Scalia Five won't be there; but we should be.
Bring a candle or a bell, like the Czechs a decade ago. Bring a copy of the Voters' Bill of Rights, or the US
Constitution. Send an e-mail to all your friends, with your favorite quote from this list. Bring Pablo Neruda's and
Marge Piercy's poems. Bring the next generation, so they will never forget. Bring your commitment to restore,
rebuild, and expand American democracy. The Supreme Court cheated. Democracy lost. For now.
This ultra-conservative group needs donations! Lend them a helping hand by sending them a few $100 or $1000 bills ... Confederate ones! Click
here to print or download the bills. Send them to other right-wing groups as well!
And if you still want to annoy the Heritage Foundation, you can always go to their
online donation form as soon as you try to leave the page, a pop-up window appears asking why you decided not to donate. Give them an explanation, but remember to be polite!
We, the undersigned voters, know that our cherished democracy is endangered from
within by the grave and potentially fatal flaws in our voting systems exposed by the
Presidential Election of 2000.
As our elected representatives, you have the duty, the opportunity, and the privilege to
correct these flaws and to restore fair and honest elections throughout our nation. To this
end, we charge you to construct and pass a VOTERS BILL OF RIGHTS, which shall
include:
Strict enforcement and extension of the Voting Rights Act to prevent the
disenfranchisement of voters and require full investigation and criminal prosecution of
any offenders;
Standardized, easily understandable federal election ballots
Funding to replace old and unreliable voting machines to ensure that every vote is
counted fairly and accurately
Genuine campaign finance reform that bans campaign contributions from special
interests
Replacement of the Electoral College with a majority-rule election, or substantial reform
of the Electoral College to allow for proportional representation
Measures to increase voter participation by eliminating bureaucratic hurdles to voter
registration and turnout, including language barriers, physical barriers, archaic
equipment, and lack of resources
Enactment and enforcement of a VOTERS BILL OF RIGHTS will restore trust in our
government and encourage participation in our democratic processes. The linchpin of a
democracy is the process by which we select our representatives and leaders. The right
to vote is our defining right as citizens of this nation. We call upon our elected
representatives to protect our Constitution from abusive exercise of government power
by enacting a VOTERS BILL OF RIGHTS.
We pledge our full and constant support for enactment of a VOTERS BILL OF
RIGHTS.
It is likely that 50% of the U.S. population is strongly dissatisfied with
the ascendancy of George W. Bush to the office of President. There are
three likely reasons:
In the interest of democracy, one could discredit election gripes (point
number one) as being unfair to our longstanding electoral college process..
Also, one might disregard Bush’s agenda (point number two) because the
hallmark of the United States Constitution is tolerance for divergent
political and moral beliefs.
However, point number three leads to a more egregious problem, namely that a
rather anonymous man, with no distinguishing ambition or vision has, by
virtue of family wealth and connection, been installed as President of the
United States. Even the most cursory glance at George W. Bush’s history and
character builds a strong case for charges of nepotism and cronyism. Such a
glaring display of favoritism, to benefit an individual with no considerable
talent, runs counter to the spirit of competition and fair play that has
driven the engine of American capitalism for more than two hundred years.
There is a way to tangibly and immediately raise a voice in protest of
George W. Bush as President. For the remainder of his term, conscientious
Americans should simply write "George W. Bush is an Idiot" on all U.S.
currency that passes through their hands.
This protest has already begun. The first bills were marked and spent in
San Francisco as of January 26, 2001. What is important, though, is to not
only begin marking all currency (and to continue the effort throughout the
Bush presidency), but to forward this memo as much as possible so as to
replicate the message throughout our money supply.
In an effort to mark money more industriously, many of us have ordered a
BUSH IS A FRAUD rubber stamp; these self-inking rubber stamps are useful for
marking the "Fraud" message in red ink.
Make your voice heard, Top twenty Republican donors with global consumer brands:
1 Philip Morris - $4,554,732
|
Parting Shots... ![]()
LURAY, VA--Seeking to foster a spirit of unity and teamwork between Democrats and Republicans under the new Bush Administration, members of
Congress attended a trust-building retreat in Virginia's Shenandoah National Park this past weekend.
"For years, Congress has been sharply divided along party lines, with Democrats and
Republicans teaming up against one another to further partisan goals," President Bush said.
"But this weekend, the congressmen came to realize that the only way to accomplish
anything--whether it's reforming Social Security or getting three people over a 20-foot wall
with just a yard of rope and an old milk jug--is through cooperation."
Upon arriving at the orienteering cabin, Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert said he
heard a great deal of complaining from fellow legislators about being taken away from
important lawmaking work.
"[Sen.] Sam [Brownback (R-KS)] was bellyaching about having a ton of bills to read.
[Rep.] Earl [Hilliard (D-AL)] was saying the retreat was 'gay' and 'for babies,'" Hastert said.
"However, a quick bicameral game of Build-A-Song soon broke the ice and had everyone
clapping."
Build-A-Song, in which each participant contributes a line about him or herself to a
growing song, was well-received by virtually all of the 535 lawmakers, with only Sen. Strom
Thurmond (R-SC) showing difficulty keeping meter.
Subsequent exercises offered the legislators physical activity and fun, but also challenged
them to reevaluate the way they look at themselves and their peers.
"I was really scared to lean back and fall into Orrin Hatch's arms," Sen. Carl Levin (D-MI) said of Saturday afternoon's "Open Arms" workshop. "After
all, this was a man who blocked countless pieces of legislation I'd tried to pass over the years. But when I finally worked up the nerve to do it and he caught
me, I realized I'd just been saved from physical harm by someone I thought was my enemy. Right then, my eyes were opened, and I thought, hey, I'm around
good people in Congress."
Another exercise, in which the legislators sat Republican-Democrat in a circle and had to say one nice thing about the person to their left, proved
embarrassing at first, but ultimately strengthened the bonds between the participants.
"I was really touched when Rep. Bill Jenkins (R-TN) told me how he admired the way I
stood up for my constituents' interests by fighting so hard for H.R. 2403, which would bring
$197 million in infrastructure upgrades to my home district," Rep. Paul Kanjorski (D-PA) said.
"During House debate, he called the bill 'pork-barrel politics at its worst.' But when we were
sitting in that circle, he apologized and admitted that he only said mean stuff about the bill
because he was trying to impress a senior Republican who was head of a subcommittee he
wanted to get on. That meant a lot to me."
Added Kanjorski: "Ever since the retreat, Bill and I have been inseparable. We're even going to
co-sponsor a bill."
The final challenge of the weekend, in which members of Congress were forced to "buddy up"
across party lines and build a log bridge across a 75-foot-wide creek, proved the most
trust-building experience of them all.
"When they told us we were supposed to build a bridge across that huge creek, we thought,
no way, that's impossible," Rep. Dick Gephardt (D-MO) said. "But with a little imagination and
a whole lot of teamwork, we actually did it. Now we feel like we can forge a better, more
cooperative U.S. government--as long as we remember to trust each other."
"When we finally finished, [Sen.] Jesse [Helms (R-NC)] started jumping up and down on the bridge yelling, 'Yes! We did it!' and then he slipped and fell in
the water," Sen. Tom Daschle (D-SD) recalled with a smile. "It was a little scary, because at first he didn't come up to the surface. But when he finally did, he
just started laughing. Then I started laughing and, before long, everybody was laughing. And when I reached into the creek to pull Jesse out, he pulled me into
the water instead! You better believe everybody was cracking up after that happened. And, boy, did we ever splash each other."
On Monday morning, members of the newly strengthened 107th Congress were sent home with their experiences, their memories, and T-shirts featuring
caricatures of all the participants.
"As President Bush kept saying on the bus ride back to D.C., whether Democrat or Republican, deep down, we are all the same," Daschle said. "And to
have fun working together is the only way to make America great." |





Issues & Alibis is published in America every Friday. We are not affiliated with, nor do we except funds from any political party. We are a non-profit group that is dedicated to the restoration of the American Republic.
In regards to copying anything from this site remember that everything here is copyrighted. Issues & Alibis has been given permission to rerun everything on this site. When this isn't possible we rely on the "Fair Use" copyright law provisions. If you copy anything from this site to reprint make sure that you do too. We ask that you get our permission to reprint anything from this site and that you provide a link back to us. Here is the "Fair Use" provision ...
In determining whether the use made of a work in
any particular case is a fair use the factors to
be considered shall include:
(1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether
such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit
educational purposes;
(2) the nature of the copyrighted work;
(3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in
relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
(4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or
value of the copyrighted work. The fact that a work is unpublished shall
not itself bar a finding of fair use if such
finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors."